Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://testdoc.viewft.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Dispute Resolution
ViewFT’s verification system is designed to be fair, but no system is perfect. The dispute resolution process ensures creators have recourse if they believe a slashing decision was incorrect.Appeal Process
- File an appeal — within 7 days of the slashing decision
- Provide evidence — submit additional sources, context, or corrections
- New Senate panel — a different set of Senators reviews the appeal (original panel excluded)
- Community re-vote — if the new Senate panel disagrees with the original decision, a community re-vote is triggered
- Final determination — the appeal outcome is final
Possible Outcomes
- Appeal upheld: ViewCred fully restored, staked tokens returned, original flaggers lose ViewCred
- Appeal denied: Original decision stands, no additional penalty for appealing
- Partial reversal: Slashing reduced (e.g., from major to minor violation)
Safeguards
- Appeals are free — creators should never be afraid to challenge a decision
- Different Senate panel prevents groupthink
- Appeal outcomes are published for transparency
- Repeated successful appeals against specific Senators affect their eligibility for re-election
Typical Timeline
| Step | Duration |
|---|---|
| Content flagged | Immediate |
| AI fact-check (Layer 1) | Minutes |
| Senate review assignment | Within 4 hours |
| Senate panel decision (Layer 2) | 12-48 hours |
| Community voting window (Layer 3) | 24-72 hours |
| Final determination | Within 5 days of initial flag |
| Appeal window opens | Immediately after determination |
| Appeal deadline | 7 days after determination |
| Appeal resolution | Within 10 days of appeal filing |